• Home
  • Overview
    • Our Story
    • People
      • Attorneys
      • Staff
    • Careers
      • Current Openings
      • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Appeals and Post – Trial Practice
    • Asbestos Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Environmental Litigation
    • General Liability
    • Government Entities
    • Insurance Defense
    • Premises Liability
    • Products Liability
    • Toxic Torts
    • Transportation & Trucking Liability
    • Workers’ Compensation
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact
WLB | Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba, P.C.
Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba, P.C.
  • Home
  • Overview
    • Our Story
    • People
      • Attorneys
      • Staff
    • Careers
      • Current Openings
      • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Appeals and Post – Trial Practice
    • Asbestos Litigation
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Environmental Litigation
    • General Liability
    • Government Entities
    • Insurance Defense
    • Premises Liability
    • Products Liability
    • Toxic Torts
    • Transportation & Trucking Liability
    • Workers’ Compensation
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact
Schedule A Consultation At 215-564-4141

Defense Strategies
That Protect You

  1. Home
  2.  — 
  3. Premises Liability
  4.  — 
  5. Are you responsible for an injury if a patron was horsing around?

Are you responsible for an injury if a patron was horsing around?

On Behalf of Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba, P.C. | Nov 23, 2023 | Premises Liability

As a business owner, you understand the importance of providing a safe environment for your customers. You also realize that accidents can happen, and you have potential liability if someone is injured on your property.

But what if horseplay was a contributing factor in your customer’s injury? Are you still liable?

Comparative negligence is the key defense

Business owners have a duty of care towards their customers, which means they are responsible for maintaining a safe environment. For example, if a customer slips and falls on your property due to a condition you were aware of or should have been aware of, you could be held responsible for their injuries.

The situation becomes more complicated if the customer was engaged in horseplay or other boisterous behavior when they were injured. This is true even when you may still be partially responsible. For example, two customers are racing through the aisles when one trips on a loose tile and is injured when they hit the floor. 

You may have some responsibility for the accident due to the loose tile, but the customer’s own actions may have also significantly contributed to their accident and injuries.

In that event, the law of comparative negligence considers the degree to which the injured party contributed to their own injury. New York follows a pure comparative negligence system; the injured party could still recover damages even if they were 99% at fault. However, their compensation would be reduced by their percentage of fault. 

Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey have a modified comparative negligence system in which the injured party can only recover damages if they were less than 51% at fault. West Virginia sets the limit at 50% fault. Therefore, the outcome of a premise’s liability case can significantly vary depending on the specifics of the incident and where it occurred.

It’s crucial to ensure your property is well-maintained and free from hazards. Rules regarding customers’ boisterous and risky behavior should also be clearly stated and enforced. 

If you are in a situation where you are being sued for a customer’s injury, experienced legal guidance can help you assert a solid defense.

Recent Posts

  • Comparative negligence laws in premises liability: Pennsylvania vs. New Jersey 
  • Managing Multi-Jurisdictional Asbestos Defense: Strategies for Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey
  • Understanding the Role of Expert Witnesses in Asbestos Litigation
  • Preparing for toxic tort defense in manufacturing
  • How the statute of limitations impacts asbestos cases

Categories

  • Asbestos and Mesothelioma Defense
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Defense
  • Environmental Defense
  • Premises Liability
  • Toxic Tort Defense
  • Trucking Defense

Archives

WLB | Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba, P.C.

Philadelphia Office

1600 Market Street
Suite 2000
Philadelphia, PA 19103
215-564-4141
Pittsburgh Office
603 Stanwix Street
Two Gateway Center, Suite 1600
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
412-255-0500

New York, NY Office

14 Wall Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10005
215-564-4141

Wheeling Office

25 11th Street
Wheeling, WV 26003
304-905-9463

Wilmington Office

919 N. Market Street
Suite 980
Wilmington, DE 19801
302-421-9935

New Jersey Office

309 Fellowship Rd.
East Gate Center
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
215-564-4141
Buffalo Office
1231 Delaware Ave
Suite 201
Buffalo, NY 14209
716-427-7360

Get In Touch

© 2026 Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review The Firm
  • Follow

 215-564-4141

 EMAIL